That has taken an unfortunately long time.  In fact I've given up on saying everything that I want to say in a compact form, and will try to only say what I think is most important.  And even that has wound up less compact than I'd like...
First a disclaimer.  Website optimization has been a large part of what I've done in the last decade, and I've been a heavy user of A/B testing.  See Effective A/B Testing for a well-regarded tutorial that I did on it several years ago.  I have much less experience with multi-armed bandit approaches.  I don't believe that I am biased.  But if I were, it is clear what my bias would be.
Here is a quick summary of what the rest of this post will attempt to convince you of.
That summary requires a lot of justification. Read on for that.
- If you have actual traffic and are not running tests, start now. I don't actually expand on this fact, but it is trivially true. If you've not started testing, it would be a shock if you can't find at least one 5-10% improvement in your business within 6 months of trying it. Odds are that you'll find several. What is that worth to you?
 - A/B testing is an effective optimization methodology.
 - A good multi-armed bandit strategy provides another effective optimization methodology. Behind the scenes there is more math, more assumptions, and the possibility of better theoretical characteristics than A/B testing.
 - Despite this, if you want to be confident in your statistics, want to be able to do more complex analysis, or have certain business problems, A/B testing likely is a better fit.
 - And finally if you want an automated "set and forget" approach, particularly if you need to do continuous optimization, bandit approaches should be considered first.
 
That summary requires a lot of justification. Read on for that.